April 17, 2000
We have noticed that the people involved in this discussion appear to end up in one of three groups:
But for us older residents, we felt it was appropriate to welcome new neighbors. We didn't try to dictate to them the type of house to build, how many trees could be cut, or whether they could put in a gravel pit (the AM/PM by the White Horse and the Reintree area by Safeway were both gravel pits, by the way).
We put our faith in our neighbors and in the laws to protect our area according to the standards of the law and of common sensibilities. And if we objected, we didn't blame our neighbor, but worked to change the laws to reflect what we thought would be better for us all.
We believed in the Golden Rule--not in gold--referring to this new avaricious breed who buy so they can hold the property just long enough for the property values to increase to the point where they can trade up. And God help anyone who may negatively impact that goal.
Maybe if we all could just remember not to judge our neighbor, but work with them by letting them know of concerns, we would get mutual agreement on how to best meet all needs. And "compromise" is not a curse word. If all else fails, why not get your concerned citizens' group together and make a fair offer for their property and life's investment?
Of course, then you may be faced with another group forming to tell you what you can do with it.
Chris & Willie Adams, Woodinville